Today I listened to a radio show about adoption because the amazing Dawn was in it.
After listening to her I decided to try and listen to some of the other shows listed under her on this site http://toginet.com/shows/adoptionjourneytomotherhood
I stopped listening to the show under Dawns when I heard the host(who is supposedly a first mom) mention something about not wanting to ‘confuse’ an adoptive child with contact or too much info.
I felt a rage inside me and stopped listening because theres nothing about having open contact with first family and adoptive family that would actually ‘confuse’ a child. I’d like to present the theory that limiting what children are supposed to know about themselves only confuses them more, not less.
Children are smarter than many parents seem to want to believe. Yes, they can get ‘overwhelmed’ with certain types of information, say about things that movies generally warm about and stuff.
I firmly believe that children, as soon as they can identify themselves in a mirror or picture, can also tell what is different or the same about their parents(adoptive or not)and themselves.
I grew up with the family I was born too, and I remember as a child having many preconceived misrepresentations of everyday life because my parents were ‘limiting’ or even substituting information that was completely misleading.
Adoptive parents do this when they believe that having their adoptive child know his/her first family confuses them if they were to become part of the everyday life. Just because an relative of the family frequents your family home, and you know them, doesn’t make things confusing for a child. In fact, it kind of makes things make more sense then if this does not happen.
I know that there is going to be much confusion about who I am(there sort of already is) to my son. Not because there is too much contact, but because there is too little contact. He is going to wonder why I wasn’t allowed to be at his birthday parties, or at his school events. He is going to be confused about the fact that even though dozens of women ‘mother’ him in the many social gatherings that his adoptive family goes too, why did I never show up.
I know my son is going to believe whatever his mom tells him. Even if I tell him I wanted to be there, I wanted to know him, I wanted to show him that I care, he will probably think that I just don’t, care that is. I know that his adoptive mom already mistakenly says that he is theirs because ‘they wanted him soo soo much‘.
From that statement his is going to conclude that I, obviously, didn’t want him. Which could never ever be true, ever!
If only I could become a part of the community, not interferring in my son’s life at all, but more availabe. I wish I could be there, in real life, as they say. I want to be like one of the many women who are the ones who are a ‘natural’ part of his everyday life. I know that his adoptive mom rarly cares for him on a one-on-one basis. She is a driven white-collar professional. She does have time for her daughter by birth, I have seen it happen, and usually frustration for my/her son.
She doesn’t think she is doing anything wrong by not including me in anything, even though she could, very easily she could!! I know she(and likely the adoptive dad) think they are going far and beyond in ‘openness’ with myself and the first father.
The reality is that visits once or twice a year, right after or just before birthday celebrations separate myself and the first father from our sons world. I can guess that to him, we are like aliens, extremely foreign and obviously not entirely welcome. Why else would we not be invited to the actual events that are full of the other people of my sons world?
Really, the only ‘confusion’ that happens is with the adults, the ones who have clearly forgotten what is it like to be a child. Really that is the only way I can explain the reason adoptive parents want to ‘simplify’ their childrens lives.
The truth, in my view, is that they want to simplify their own lives. They(adoptive parents don’t want to tell everyone the truth. They want to pretend that it would be to ‘hard’ for the children to understand just because they don’t want to have to explain it. The truth being that adoptive parents paid for the right to be parents with money. That they took that privilege away from a first family. A first family that will always be a part of the child that they can now call ‘their own’. They really don’t want to think about the fact that they are raising a stranger, a person whos apperance and personality with always be completely foreign, no matter how are they look for the ‘similarities’.
Yes, I think that this ‘confusion’ theory is hurtful. I think it is just an excuse to erase a first family out of a childs life for the sake of only the adoptive parents comfort.
I will always greive for the fact that myson adoptive parents have choosen to reguard me, and my family and the first fathers family, as less important. Less important than even casual friends, less important simply because I am not a part of their ‘world’.
I could be a part of their world, I would fit in too. I am technically equal to many of the adoptive parents family and friends in terms of background, social status, even education and employment. If not, those would be attenable at least.
I am still angry, but writing this has helped a little.